|
Post by Global Parasite on Jun 28, 2008 21:04:07 GMT
If you're not new to all this, you probably don't need to read this. If this is the first time you're coming across this kind of information, don't leave. If you're going to form an opinion - you better be informed. Why haven't you been exposed to information like this before? There are various powerful interests that have always been able to keep a lid on things. However, the internet changed everything...
"We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries." - David Rockefeller (one of most richest fuckers in the world), founder of the Trilateral Commission, in an address to a meeting of The Trilateral Commission, in June, 1991
|
|
|
Post by Global Parasite on Jun 30, 2008 19:02:49 GMT
Not seeing the wood because of the trees. That date is rather modern in terms of the chronology of the NWO. Are you not seeing it unfold before your very eyes? Extremely successfull! "If you're going to form an opinion - you better be informed" it said. Very interesting to hear the BBC give Adam Walton a bollocking for playing Seven Seven. Disgusting for those who lost loved ones. Sir Ian Blair labelled the investigation into July 7th, 'the biggest criminal inquiry in English history', yet, days after July 7th, then British Prime Minister Tony Blair had already refused the British people a Public Inquiry. It's still the same. Like 9/11. Everythings still the same. GIVE US REAL EVIDENCE AND PROVE US WRONG! www.julyseventh.co.uk/This post isn't here for us to debate. Well it's not a debate we'll involve ourselves in on this board. Don't hate the media. Become the media.
|
|
matt cba logging in
Guest
|
Post by matt cba logging in on Jun 30, 2008 21:07:51 GMT
Loose change was badley put together and badley researched, some of it is even embarresing. Although there is a new one, which I've not yet seen. Yes of course there are Islamic Extremists. False flag attacks by/involving criminal elements of governments only inspire more. Create an enemy, age old fucking tactic. My personal opinion on 9/11: Criminal elements within government knew it was going to happen, and helped it on its way, it was perfect. Just like Pearl Harbour. It's not a new thing. When you have what is now massive movements such as scholars of 9/11 truth (scientists, physists, basically any intellectual not connected to a government institute or whatever, etc etc) all crying out with evidence and being ignored by mainstream media you certainly have to ask yourself a few questions, and begin to question your world view. Demand answers. zeitgeistmovie.com/
|
|
|
Post by davecox on Jul 2, 2008 12:20:10 GMT
on loose change... 'Is that a bomb strapped to the bottom of that plane?' (prove it isn't) ~loose change doesnt speculate whether anything was attached to the bottom of the plane, i think youre getting the film confused with another film called "911 In Plane Sight" 'Were the Towers detonated from within?' ~loose change talks about how the official version of how the buildings (1,2 and 7) collapsed is scientifically impossible, for example the buildings falling at free fall speed, jet fuel burning at a temperature that is nearly 1000 degrees too cold to melt the steel collumns of the towers, and Larry Silverstein making his $7 billion insurance scam specifically covering the world trade centre complex from 'acts of terrorism' SIX WEEKS before it happened. it also points out a number of controlled demolition experts who questioned the official version of events and then radically changed their view with no explanation why. aswell as a number of controlled demolition experts who are not in anyway connected to the current administration and have no other explanation for the collapse of the towers and building 7 other than controlled demolition. 'Are passengers still alive?' " well we dont know do we, this part of the film did seem abit speculation to me, but we have seen a number of mainstream media reports saying 13 of the 19 suicide bombers have been found alive, abroad and rich! guardian.150m.com/september-eleven/hijackers-alive.htmRemote control planes have been around for a long time, and would explain alot. youtube.com/watch?v=x_ZbaQYNDAg that was in the 1940's for fuck sake! heres another related article www.prisonplanet.com/911.html#remotecontrolWhy did George W. Bush sign executive order W199i, prohibiting the FBI and CIA from arresting members of Al Qaeda (before 911)?! www.prisonplanet.com/911.html#w199iWhy isnt this open to debate? Fuck it lets av it boys an girls! i just rushed this together quickly but im all ears, this is something im confident is true and will avail critical thinking (something which the mainstream media will not allow on this issue)
|
|
matt cba logging in
Guest
|
Post by matt cba logging in on Jul 2, 2008 16:36:23 GMT
It didn't say "not open for debate" I basically said I was just putting it on here for everyone else to fanny over. "dont hate the media, become the media" Makes interesting reading between doing the millions of other things I have to do!
|
|
|
Post by davecox on Jul 3, 2008 10:52:59 GMT
ok, so executive orders signed by the president, the largest insurance scams in history and an official version of what really happened to the towers contradicting basic science are in the same category as the fuckin wombles...?!
Anyway..... Speaking of american legislation to harbour terrorists... A similar agreement has been made in the UK, look up the "Covenant of Security". An agreement between MI5 and a radical muslim network named Al-Muhajiroun to allow shelter for radical muslims on british soil as long as they dont attack britain. This 'covenant' was apparently declared broken in 2004 by Omar Bakri (WHO HAPPENS TO BE AN AGENT FOR MI6) due to post-911, anti-terrorist legislation that meant Britain had become open territory for muslim conquest.
Weve seen the headlines, the british police 'can do nothing' against these muslim nutters with fuckin hooks for hands (Abu Hamza, he's an MI6 agent too by the way)... but if thats true, how is it that they can deport women suffering from leukimia (spelling?) and need crucial treatment back to south africa where they consequently die, and they cant deport a radical muslim calling for more terrorist attacks?!!
Its simply a staged scenario, if you cant find an enemy; you have to create one; to justify higher security measures, more and more police powers etc etc. Unified global powers (while at the same time dividing the global population with fear), were easier to digest in handy little bitesize pieces, an thats the elites dream, total control.
|
|
|
Post by juz on Jul 3, 2008 15:49:03 GMT
Haaahaaa, Duncan I agree with you on this one, and imagine the half brained idiots that would dedicate most there material based on this fear. Its a scarey world out there, lets all be thankfull that theres a few decent, moral types fighting for the survival of the human race with screaming tales of impending doom. tee hee. Thats Jokes.
|
|
|
Post by Sam on Jul 3, 2008 21:37:44 GMT
The fact you mention Micheal Moore in your point about "conspiracy theories" says alot. fuck him. Im a media/current affairs/politics student. That guy's films are shite, he missed out loads of important things in Farenheit 11. Fat bitch.
Besides that, it would appear Duncan is agreeing more with the Global Parasite clan to be honest. Although, juz would love to have everyone against their beliefs, his rants were entertaing in college, the jeolousy was beyond obvious!
At the end of the day, the official version of events concerning recent events (9/11, 7/7) are merely conspiracy theories aswell, just with no substancial evidence, and yet we are expected to take them as read! haha! jesus, and yet theories with more enuff evidence to convict twenty million times over is ignored! Lets make an analogy: if this was with a murder case, with the official version of events' so called evidence it would get thrown out of a court.
|
|
|
Post by Peter Griffin on Jul 4, 2008 7:14:11 GMT
Wow! A media student! I believe all this nonsense now it has an intellectual behind it!
|
|
|
Post by davecox on Jul 4, 2008 13:53:22 GMT
im pretty sure my point still stands
|
|
|
Post by 4STICKS on Jul 4, 2008 16:49:31 GMT
This really doesn't belong here..... THE 4STICKS.....ACOUSTIC BOOGIE TONIGHT IN RHYL @ 'LAST ORDERS'
|
|
|
Post by NWA on Jul 14, 2008 17:23:51 GMT
A portion of Charlie Brookers latest article for the guardian, i think it sums up the reactions and arguments in this thread pretty well;
"That's just one broad objection to all the bullshit theories. But try suggesting it to someone in the midst of a 9/11 fairytale reverie, and they'll pull a face and say, "Yeah, but ... " and start banging on about some easily misinterpreted detail that "makes you think" (when it doesn't) or "contradicts the official story" (when you misinterpret it). Like nutbag creationists, they fixate on thinly spread, cherry-picked nuggets of "evidence" and ignore the thundering mass of data pointing the other way."
|
|
|
Post by PWA on Jul 14, 2008 18:37:28 GMT
and he writes for the guradian. believing the official version of events is bordering on insainty
|
|
|
Post by adamwalton on Jul 14, 2008 21:58:17 GMT
The real villain is the internet.
The minor villains are the news and media organisations who mis-reported so much of what did happen on the day and who have, subsequently, done things to damage people's belief in their integrity and veracity.
Take the BBC's mis-reporting of building 7 coming down. That would never have happened in the days before rolling news coverage. Fucking up that one aspect of reporting the story has given conspiracy theorists more kerosene for their bonfire.
All of the facts have melted.
The truth has been vaporised.
|
|
|
Post by Matt on Jul 15, 2008 11:26:40 GMT
Take the BBC's mis-reporting of building 7 coming down. That would never have happened in the days before rolling news coverage. Fucking up that one aspect of reporting the story has given conspiracy theorists more kerosene for their bonfire. more than just "mis-reporting" would'nt you say? The fact they were reporting the collapse of Building 7, with it clearly in the background, in their footage before it happended is somewhat suspicious? Building 7, never hit by a plane, the first building in history to ever collapse (in that pure example of building demolition style too!) from fire! It's an insult to intellegence. There's so many people making silly excuses and pathetic debunking attempts. It's just like The Gulf Of Tonkin incident, just like Pearl Harbour and hundreds of other orchastrated/semi orchastrated attacks. And Duncan, I think your wrong, do you seriously have the opinion that huge amounts of population already hates the government? I really don't think this is the case. I don't think the NWO agenda is common knowledge at all. I don't think the seriousness of the agenda is known at all. I certainly do not believe that the majoriy of population are of the opinion you stated. The mojority of people do trust the government even after things like the whole lying to us about Iraq's WMD and the complete exposure of the David Kelly job. They still trust and follow after admittions from CIA agents on their fucking death beds regarding the Kennedy assanation. And so on and so on. They know, they've seen it, but it's just easier to ignore it and pretend everything is ok, so much so that they fully believe everything is ok, and "we're" the good guys! Yes there is dis-information, alot of it. I've seen some hilarious stuff online and in documentorys. Best use sources like scholars for truth, people like that, people with very high levels of intellegence not part of media and not attached to government institutes. I've even began to ignore the majority of Alex Jones' reports, he's let me down far too often. As for Micheal Moore...haha don't make us laugh. There's fear on all sides, but, if the truth campaign can be assesed as being fear mongery then fine, let that be your opionion but here's a question you cannot ignore like the politians we all apprently hate, what is more damaging, the fear of knowing what the "string-pullers" are up to or the fear of government/media propaganda, wars, enemies, etc to totally take away our liberties (if you can't see that happening then your fuckin blind) to put us in a similar world setting as 1984 where everything is fucking grey, imagination is blank, people are bastard robots and we can't even think without being ordered how to? I haven't got kids, but if I did I'd probably put getting the fuck out of this place on my to do list before a house and mortgage! Am i exaggerating? Look at whats going on! Here I am posting, contradicting original statements, but there we go, call me opinionated man matt (only a few will get that haha)
|
|